Share Thread:
|
1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate?
|
|
05-26-2012, 10:06 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: 1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate?
I preferred a numeric grade, no matter how low it might be. As Greco mentioned, nice to know where it stands. I got this graded a long time ago and it has subgrades. Wound up with 7.0, 1.5, 2, and 2.
<img src="http://www.jplarson.com/hosted/1956 Topps Mantle BGS 20.jpg"></a>  2000 Absolute Leather & Laces | Chicago Bears TTM | 1999 Finest |
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate? - lilgman - 11-29-2011, 10:34 AM
RE: 1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate? - jsw_2003 - 04-23-2012, 02:19 PM
RE: 1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate? - nolan5000 - 04-24-2012, 02:46 AM
RE: 1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate? - greco827 - 04-26-2012, 11:28 PM
RE: 1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate? - jplarson - 05-26-2012 10:06 PM
RE: 1956 mantle....numeric grade or authenticate? - gangstippie - 05-30-2012, 05:52 AM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)