Anyone else notice this? - Printable Version
+- Beckett Message Boards (http://www.beckett.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Hobby Talk (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Baseball (/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Anyone else notice this? (/thread-1514763.html)
Anyone else notice this? - sfreinker - 09-26-2012 10:34 AM
The Topps 2012 base set has an error on the numbering of their cards. They show on the Nelson Cruz #360 card with a checklist on the back has Rod Barajas listed as #391 while his card has #395 on it. Any signifigance?
RE: Anyone else notice this? - sfreinker - 09-26-2012 04:03 PM
So I pulled a Rod Brajas that was numbered 391. I now have a Rod Barajas card #391 and #395. Wonder when that error will be caught.
RE: Anyone else notice this? - bunk27 - 09-26-2012 06:42 PM
I doubt it will carry a premium, but good find.
RE: Anyone else notice this? - reds77 - 09-26-2012 07:36 PM
It's a known error.
And it won't carry a premium because it does not appear to have been corrected.
RE: Anyone else notice this? - sfreinker - 09-26-2012 09:22 PM
I figured it wouldn't really carry a premium anyway since it wasn't a really popular player card. But it's still cool nonetheless. Thanks!
RE: Anyone else notice this? - hckydv7 - 09-27-2012 08:36 AM
(09-26-2012 07:36 PM)reds77 Wrote: It's a known error.
It was corrected the there is 2 versions of the Barajas card 1 numbered 391 and 1 numbered 395, but they both seem to be showing up about the same amount.
RE: Anyone else notice this? - aprirr - 09-28-2012 02:27 PM
I have a Barajas #391 but the back is reversed or upside down. Is that part of the error?
RE: Anyone else notice this? - nyyankeesfan28 - 09-29-2012 02:34 PM
I pulled a Barajas #391 and the back is flipped, I also pulled a Barajas #395 with the back normal, and I pulled a Jonathan Lucroy #395, as well, with the back normal.