[bgraff]

In Organize, why doesn't Beckett include half-point condition values for graded cards? I understand there is some subjectivity to a 7.5 (somewhere between a 7 and an 8), but in Organize, why not allow the value to at least calculate to the lowest end of the range, in my example a 7? Can this be fixed?

[bgraff]

In Organize, why doesn't Beckett include half-point condition values for graded cards? I understand there is some subjectivity to a 7.5 (somewhere between a 7 and an 8), but in Organize, why not allow the value to at least calculate to the lowest end of the range, in my example a 7? Can this be fixed?

On the condition value tab. No one else bothered by this?

[bojesphob]

I don't use org anymore because of a bunch of little things like this.I have an excel spreadsheet I developed that has my entire list in it. Although I don't put values in it since I can't access them anymore

[dmasci]

Not only are there no half point values in the organize, many cards don't have them in the online price guide....if you can't give a value, quit grading them that way.

[bgraff]

Not only are there no half point values in the organize, many cards don't have them in the online price guide....if you can't give a value, quit grading them that way.

Agree. And it makes the overall collection value tools inaccurate, particularly for those who use Beckett grading and get in a fair amount of 7.5's, 8.5's, etc. Even if the site just allowed a 7.5 to default to a 7.0 value (while understandably not ideal), at least this problem would be mitigated. Why can't this occur?

[gfyfocus]

simple solution step one unless its pc send in at 9.5 or no grade. step 2 use worthpoint.com terapeak.com and sortsof.com step 3 ignore beckett values step 4 get back in the time machine and come back to 2016