[slotman11]

I swear these dbags NEVER learn... Why don't they just SHUT UP and play ball???

http://www.rantsports.com/philadelphia-e...m-comment/

[philly eagle in az]

I couldn't agree with Vick anymore on the team being a dynasty

lol but I know he should not be saying that!

[slotman11]

(08-03-2012 04:29 PM)philly eagle in az Wrote:  I couldn't agree with Vick anymore on the team being a dynasty

lol but I know he should not be saying that!

I know you are a huge Eagles fan, and you must have cringed big time when that came out of his mouth...

[ieagles]

Hey man... He's just excited with the team hes playing with. Ill be honest, this years eagles team is the best one in a really long time. Even better than the '04 Super Bowl team.

[slotman11]

(08-03-2012 05:22 PM)ieagles Wrote:  Hey man... He's just excited with the team hes playing with. Ill be honest, this years eagles team is the best one in a really long time. Even better than the '04 Super Bowl team.

So VY was crucified last year for saying "Dream Team", but Vick saying "Dynasty" is acceptable??? I am kind of confused...

[rjcj2017]

Um, to be a dynasty, don't you have to win ONE first?

Then TWO? And are you even a dynasty if you've won less than THREE?

And if those THREE come more than like a year or two apart from each other, can it really be considered a dynasty?

Like, the Bulls winning six titles in eight or nine years or whatever (when MJ was actually on the team) counts as a dynasty.

Yeah, Vick, just try playing all 16 games in a season. Make that your first goal.

Actually, make keeping your mouth shut your first goal.

Then the 16 games.

Then one Super Bowl.

Then more Super Bowls.

Then, if all those happen, you can talk about dynasty.

[georgehenrycollector]

(08-03-2012 06:20 PM)rjcj2017 Wrote:  Um, to be a dynasty, don't you have to win ONE first?

Then TWO? And are you even a dynasty if you've won less than THREE?

And if those THREE come more than like a year or two apart from each other, can it really be considered a dynasty?

Like, the Bulls winning six titles in eight or nine years or whatever (when MJ was actually on the team) counts as a dynasty.

Yeah, Vick, just try playing all 16 games in a season. Make that your first goal.

Actually, make keeping your mouth shut your first goal.

Then the 16 games.

Then one Super Bowl.

Then more Super Bowls.

Then, if all those happen, you can talk about dynasty.

I have to agree

[mcleodfive]

(08-03-2012 06:20 PM)rjcj2017 Wrote:  Um, to be a dynasty, don't you have to win ONE first?

Then TWO? And are you even a dynasty if you've won less than THREE?

And if those THREE come more than like a year or two apart from each other, can it really be considered a dynasty?

Like, the Bulls winning six titles in eight or nine years or whatever (when MJ was actually on the team) counts as a dynasty.

Yeah, Vick, just try playing all 16 games in a season. Make that your first goal.

Actually, make keeping your mouth shut your first goal.

Then the 16 games.

Then one Super Bowl.

Then more Super Bowls.

Then, if all those happen, you can talk about dynasty.

Lol you just summarized what the guy said.... Nice!!

Now back on topic it doesnt bother me at all from Vick to say that. I didn't care that young said dream team either. The key is they need to back it up. If I had a choice on which to "destroy" the guy about though, it would VY because he can do so much off the bench.... Vick is the opposite, he actually PLAYS and could influence to that. If Vick thinks he can do it with this team then good for him, but VY I am the bench player on this Dream Team! Aren't we amazing.

[rjcj2017]

(08-03-2012 09:11 PM)mcleodfive Wrote:  Lol you just summarized what the guy said.... Nice!!

Now back on topic it doesnt bother me at all from Vick to say that. I didn't care that young said dream team either. The key is they need to back it up. If I had a choice on which to "destroy" the guy about though, it would VY because he can do so much off the bench.... Vick is the opposite, he actually PLAYS and could influence to that. If Vick thinks he can do it with this team then good for him, but VY I am the bench player on this Dream Team! Aren't we amazing.

That's funny ... I didn't actually read the link before I posted — just goes to show you that most rational, intelligent sports fans realize how off base he is.

Michael Vick should go nowhere near the word dynasty, nor should the Philadelphia Eagles.

If he's asked anything about a dynasty, he should say, "Sorry, I'm not qualified to talk about that and neither is anyone on my team."

As for Vince Young, a one-year deal to be the backup in ... Buffalo?

My, how the mighty have fallen.

---

(08-03-2012 07:11 PM)georgehenrycollector Wrote:  I have to agree

Yeah, like, as dominant as the Miami Heat were this year, technically for now they're just a one-hit wonder, like the Warriors, Bullets and SuperSonics in the 1970s ...

The 2006 ring doesn't count toward a dynasty because A) It was 6 years ago and 2) It was basically a completely different team other than Wade.

So, the Big Three have to win at least two more rings in the next 4-5 years to even enter the conversation ... and they're WAY ahead of the Eagles at this point in time.

[koolkellygirl]

My god, shoot the guy! All he said is that HE thinks the EAGLES COULD become a dynasty. Now tell me what is wrong with that? People hate Vick-that's why this is an issue. I'd rather my QB be pumped up about his teammates and get the ball rolling with a statement like that than say "uh, no comment".

He didn't say the are a dynasty...I like how enthusiastic he is about the Eagles. Go Vick, go Eagles...