06-19-2008, 08:00 AM
Brad1431
06-19-2008, 08:01 AM
how much do you think they paid for that?
www*amazingheroes*com
06-19-2008, 08:16 AM
From the wording of the last paragraph it looks like Topps did not own what they thaught the bought. I guess this was all over nothing. I can understand Topps point. Why would they pay all that money if they dident have exclusive rights to the stuff? I guess some lawers are getting fired today.......
Steve
Amazing Heroes
Union NJ 07083
Steve
Amazing Heroes
Union NJ 07083
lisu
06-19-2008, 08:18 AM
Brad1431 Wrote:how much do you think they paid for that?
They probably only had to pay their lawyers' fees...so maybe $100,000 depending on how ridiculous their lawyers are. Topps probably had to pay more for legal fees.
06-19-2008, 08:21 AM
Maybe if these damn companies would stop fighting over the rights of dead people they could concentrate more on not releasing horse crap products. And the money that they spend on Court Fees and Lawyers could be spent on actual "Legendary" players autographs and game used memorabilia to actually put into a Box of SP Legendary cuts to make the Legendary part true,
or as it should be could "Non SP, maybe a Legendary Player in the future Cuts"
or as it should be could "Non SP, maybe a Legendary Player in the future Cuts"
brouthercard
06-19-2008, 08:22 AM
So what does topps exactly have exclusive rights to?
bigguy219
06-19-2008, 08:22 AM
I never believed a company could "own" names and player statistics. I always felt these existed in the public name.
To me the issue has always been with the images, which are covered by copyright law.
That being said, companies like CMG disgust me. Once a player is dead ... that should be it. Stop making money off corpses.
To me the issue has always been with the images, which are covered by copyright law.
That being said, companies like CMG disgust me. Once a player is dead ... that should be it. Stop making money off corpses.
Frow
06-19-2008, 08:27 AM
bigguy219 Wrote:I never believed a company could "own" names and player statistics. I always felt these existed in the public name.
To me the issue has always been with the images, which are covered by copyright law.
That being said, companies like CMG disgust me. Once a player is dead ... that should be it. Stop making money off corpses.
Then stop buying cards of dead players
muskiesfan
06-19-2008, 10:05 AM
I'm glad UD can go back to business as usual. I'm happy that Topps was not able to prevent from UD from moving forward.
Joe
Joe
bigguy219
06-19-2008, 10:10 AM
Frow Wrote:bigguy219 Wrote:I never believed a company could "own" names and player statistics. I always felt these existed in the public name.
To me the issue has always been with the images, which are covered by copyright law.
That being said, companies like CMG disgust me. Once a player is dead ... that should be it. Stop making money off corpses.
Then stop buying cards of dead players
The issue I have isn't with the card companies. The issue I have is with agencies like CMG that continue to charge for the person's likeness even after they're dead. I believe that once they're deceased, any company that has a MLB license should be able to produce cards of that player without having to shell out money to some agent. No one should own these players.